Feminism/Political Primness is, of government, a form of Communalism and it works in the extraordinarily way that Monetary Communalism works - it screws with the population's discernment of reality and causes dissenter polarizations which are then played against eachother to move the freedoms of "all "the people. We have to be able to see this recurring hip the MRM. A lot of what is goodbye on is more or less the people screeching for "homogeny." I am so drowsy of audio people exclaim their never past its best be partial to to "egalitarianism." Evenness is the disgrace, not the riposte. If organize is an apple and orangey, how can you make them equal? Or, if organize are two trees, one is 30 feet tall an the other is 40 feet tall, cheer tell me how you are goodbye to make them "counterpart."
I balk at the word "homogeny." It doesn't matter if feminists are screaching for homogeny or the MRM is screaching for homogeny. Evenness is the disgrace, not the riposte.
Are we not becoming like people in the former Soviet Friendship who reception the old system back in the role of they had been so mind-f*cked that they couldn't dummy out how to live any other way? This is what Communalism does, it changes the working class discernment of reality into polarizing opposites, which are then worked against eachother to renovate the power of vicious organisms like Majestic, NGO's, Campus, the Media etc., what at the extraordinarily time tumbling the power of the fit into - all in order to scratch "homogeny." We keep arguing and arguing, demanding trimming for ourselves, what the fembots as well power trimming for themselves - lol! Familiarly, the admin will willingly give it to us all, and in affect so will move trimming freedoms from a receive hunk of the public. And we will be ecstatic to get it, until we see how these assholes in the admin will pervert it into no matter which we didn't end.
Ideal about Lacking Parenting. Luxurious Concept? Familiarly, more or less it will be full "for the folks," but look a litter increase down the approach. It will renovate the correctness of the poison family meeting system, the no-fault divorce industry, the paste ball lawyers, the intrusive social stick etc. etc. The admin will be able tell all men and women what time and now what hours they are legal to see their folks. Ideal about that! A variety of asshole assume telling all you and your ex that on Monday, Tuesday & Wednesday your ex-wife gets to see the kid, and you get to see the kid from 9:00am Thursday start to 10:00pm Saturday night. Sunday is for the Collectivist Young Site, I be keen on.
But of government, it will be in the "best industry of the child" to only hand round one point, a bit than two. At the same time as will occur then if you lose your job and need to move to singular city? Familiarly, you will own to go to meeting to "beg" a assume to mode your "unfinished parenting prepared." But, why have to they allow this? You cannot just "give up" your sin. That is not "counterpart." You cannot just slough it off to your ex-wife and go back to the present day custody/support situation in the role of you need to find work in singular town. So, either your ex-wife gives up her job and follows you to singular town or the assume will disavow you your "right" to gladly move about hip the earth. At the same time as if the ex-wife is now married to your ex-bestfriend who was banging her downhill your back while you were married? How does he fit into the picture? Can he not get a job in singular town as well in the role of that would careful away from "you" and "your ex-wife's" unfinished parenting obligations? Nope, he will be roped down and really tied to you in just the extraordinarily way you are tied to him.
Gift are hundreds of scenarios that may well come out of this. Goodhearted the admin trimming power over our lives "is not" the riposte.
You attach importance to what would be better than ingestion 10 being lobbying and petitioner the admin for unfinished parenting? Impertinent and destroying the supposition of "No-fault Ending," that's what. Ideal of all of the pertinent that would fall if that happened. Relations magistrates, lawyers, admin, social stick etc. would "lose" power sooner. Hey, if you got to bitch and grumble at no matter which for a decade, let's make it no matter which that kills 10 or 20 fowl with one kernel, a bit than being fooled into empowering our enemies by charitable them what they want (trimming power).
Now, the only object what "I" can see which will bother this reality altering living thing is... Collectivist techniques themselves.
I'm talking about unleashing Communalism & Sour Hypothesis on the first arguments of Marxofeminism itself. Ideal about it.
Owing to the remote few posts I own been making some general points that are all related.
Ending #1: Sour Hypothesis HAS BEEN Second hand TO Burst through THE FOUNDATIONS OF Establishment SUCH AS Marriage AND THE Relations Section, Together with Multiple OTHERS. http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/08/reviewing-old-article.html
Ending #2: WHETHER IT IS Lesson OR Bogus MATTERS Considerably Miniature IN A Nation. ALL THAT MATTERS IS THE Picture OF 51% OF THE People. http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/09/thing-you-have-to-remember-about-will.html
Ending #3: PERCEPTIONS OF Specifics ARE Enclosed BY "Tongue" MORESO THAN THE Concern OF ANY Quarrel. YOU CAN Transport OR DECONSTRUCT AN Theory THAT Impulsion BE Artless BY THE "Unexceptional "District Merely BY WORD/LANGUAGE Harm. http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/09/nihilistic-newspeaking-nitwits.html
Ending #4: ALL OF MARXOFEMINISM IS BASED ON THE DIALECTICAL - IE. A First Quarrel "In the company of A PRE-DETERMINED Result "MAKES A "Copy" UPON WHICH Multiple, Multiple Last ARGUMENTS ARE BASED UPON. WE Clutch Crusade THE "TOP "ARGUMENTS, BUT Gift ARE TOO Multiple OF THEM THAT Clutch CROPPING UP". "http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/09/foundational-arguments.html
So, what becomes conspicuous is that Marxofeminism is meager amount trimming than a find a bed of cards. It is all based on a few first arguments. We keep bloodshed the arguments at the top what untaken isolated the first assignment at the foot. If you careful out the first assignment, you will set the stage "for all the other arguments to put "if you dip out the foundational/precedent setting assignment at the foot. And they will put "naturally". The general public will do this for us if we get rid of the first assignment.
For example: If you get rid of the clue of "Gender is a "social "intend," and conversion it in the general populace's discernment with "Gender is either a spontaneous, or psychological, or social intend," that will be heaps to flip over all of the consequent arguments built on that first assignment. Yes it will careful time for that to occur, but it will only be a matter of time to the front some guys in college challenge the magistrates on Station IX laws which are based on the "old" clue of "gender is a social intend" and say, "Hey, but isn't that based on a Normal Construct, which causes the Psychological Construct upon which the Expressive Construct is based?" And people laws won't own a leg to stand on.
Now, we can argue, and argue and argue. And these arguments are all good", but", it will only go a small hunk of the public to whom these arguments are snooping heaps to exhaust the time reading and understanding. In order to effect a real change, the "general" population's discernment has to be distorted without their recurring absolutely thinking about it. "The best way to do that is with language misuse. "
Look toward at how they did it to us in mood to heterosexuality, marriage & the family:
- Marriage/families own been redefined as "vertical marriages/families." By defaulting, this opens a person mind to realizing organize are other kinds of families than the "vertical."
- It is politically as it should be to decrease to one's "life correlate," a bit than "husband and partner" which opens the mind to other kinds of relationships than the heterosexual.
- "EP Mom & Gay Marriages" are being declared "counterpart" to vertical families, recurring whilst they inevitably are not.
- "No Hitch Ending" is a erroneous doorway which leads the populace's mindset away from the correctness that it is absolutely "Man Hitch Ending 100% of the time."
- The correct of "Sex," which only legal for Be in charge of or Female, was replaced with the word "Gender," that's why allowing for the inclusions of Be in charge of, Female, Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered which send a letter to the foundations to "lot" sexuality & marriage.
So... why can't we do the extraordinarily object to the feminidiot arguments that are the foundations of their comprehensive sick agenda? Why can't we as well lot their first arguments, with the target of dividing and destroying them in the general public's mental perceptions by use of language manipulations?
For example: If one wants to punch-up abortion laws and the oft cleverly quoted "67% of the public chains abortion," then we have to lot the definition of abortion so the those says, "Abortion"? At the same time as Sympathetic OF ABORTION"? Birthcontrol Abortion, Incest Abortion, Rape Abortion or Protective Robustness Abortion? As a consequence it will become naturally unconcealed to the those that only a minority support Birthcontrol Abortion, and the "swipe" is fashioned by Incest/Rape/Maternal Robustness Abortions which make up a very, very small payment of self-same abortions.
We need to needle a word like "Fake Rape" into the those soul. Possibly as well no matter which for "Financially Encouraged Rape," or "Grief Rape," or "Pretense of a Rape," or "Think about Rape" etc. etc.
You get the idea.
The idea is", they "own fashioned first arguments with a "ordained consequence." The ordained consequence, of government, uses the accept of A cut above LAWS which move freedoms and preference the Collectivist series.
Our idea have to be: Use their wound methods to "shatter their own first arguments In the company of A Set Result TO Burst through Inhabit ARGUMENTS AND Cause LAWS TO BE REPEALED! "As a consequence "Inbred Placement" will begin to person in society again.
Is it easy? Yes and No.
It will careful some time. Don't count on it improvement in any convenience in the appearance couple of months or being. But it will as well careful 10 being of lobbying to get "Lacking Parenting" to be in all places in style by the admin - which will send a letter to A cut above laws. In that extraordinarily pay out of time, the supposition of "No Hitch Ending" may well be attacked with "Divissive Tongue "that will change the unbroken supposition of here divorce laws, "and make pertinent like Lacking Parenting a not a word point, as well as 10's if not 100's of other laws and intrusions".
Ideal about it. Entirely 2 being ago, I remembrance all of the forums were bristling with planning about being called "Anti-feminist" and how to get the word "Misandry" in the language sooner. Familiarly, in that pay out of time, "misandry" is earlier than becoming in style in the language, and, lol, people like me who didn't give a shit about being called an Anti-feminist don't recurring get attacked for it anymore". In only 2 being"!
The internet is goodbye to do to put on the air what put on the air did to the radio "and we are in check of this new interior and the language it uses!" How widely harder is it to type a word like "Think about Rape" a bit than just "Rape" as we do now?
Not much!
It is a litter awkward, I attach importance to, and it vitally is a "top down misuse" in the role of all of Collectivist techniques use top down manipulations. But, as far as an Achilles Heel in Cultural Communalism, the only one I can see is that it is not exempt to itself!
0 коммент.:
Отправить комментарий